U.K. Advertising Standards Authority Takes Stand Against Airbrushing

I recently wrote an article about airbrushing in the media and the unhealthy body image such doctored pictures promote for women.  Now the U.K’s Advertising Standards Authority has taken a hardline, banning  product ads of Julia Roberts for Lancome and Christy Turlington for Maybeline (both companies falling under the umbrella of L’Oreal). Check out the ads here, along with L’Oreal’s “justifications.”  Member of Parliament Jo Swinson stated that the “adverts were not representative of the results the products could achieve.”  In addition to L’Oreal’s mispresenting of the products, Swinson expressed her concern that such ads could lead to body image problems.

Entertainment Weekly did obtain a telling comment from Sharon A. Blinkoff, an attorney with Venable LLP who’s represented clients in the cosmetic industry for more than 20 years and sits on the board of directors of the Independent Cosmetics Manufacturers Association, giving her opinion that the United States Trade Commission wouldn’t have granted similar consumer protection:

“Under U.S. law, the question becomes whether a consumer acting reasonably would be in some way misled and believe that the product would do things that it doesn’t in fact do. I think consumers are used to cosmetic companies taking some creative license with their presentation and generally know what foundation products do and what they don’t do. Our regulatory agencies recognize the ‘sophistication’ of the American consumer…There’s also the notion that these are not very high-ticket items: consumers can judge for themselves whether they’re satisfied, and if they’re not satisfied, they won’t buy it again…. Even the lighting that you use when you take a photo of a model will sometimes change the appearance. Are we now gonna say everybody has to be put under standard lighting, so that we make sure that there’s no deviation? Instead of having beauty shots, we’ll have mug shots. Consumers like the aspirational characteristics of these photographs. They know that they’re not gonna become a Julia Roberts.” Continue reading

Photoshopping: Acceptable Art or Promotion of Unhealthy Body Images?

The media has been buzzing lately about the AMA’s new policy speaking out against advertiser’s heavily photoshopped images that distort model’s body images.  I believe (as does the AMA) that young girls see these unrealistic images and believe these models are something to aspire towards.  The AMA has stated that these pictures contribute to eating disorders and other health problems in children and adolescents.  Likewise, The Girl Scouts are launching a campaign called Healthy MEdia: Commission for Positive Images of Women and Girls to work with media leaders to address this issue.

I read an article in the Huffington Post today discussing in part a French proposal to require the publishers of enhanced images to provide a warning label or risk fines.  Photographers on the other hand say that their artistic freedom should not be hindered for any reason.

As a writer, I’m all for artistic freedom. But I think that passing off these images of women as being the real thing and normal and healthy is irresponsible. There is a line between art and commerce, and how the image is being used and represented.  When I’m writing fiction, I’m not trying to pass it off as nonfiction (I’ll leave that to James Frey).  I do think it could be a fine line to regulate.  What’s artistic vision and what’s straight-up misleading?  What’s fixing a blemish and what’s turning someone into a head on a stick? Continue reading

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 238 other followers

%d bloggers like this: